Showing posts with label Thirdcloud Media. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thirdcloud Media. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 17, 2011

Your Last Dime The Credit Industry “Perception of Others" Campaign



By: R.A. Monaco
May 18, 2011

When it comes to the subject of bankruptcy, perceptions matter to troubled debtors far more than reflected in public debate. A common argument heard by credit industry lobbyists centers on dogmatic concerns of moral slackness that causes people, who they claim can repay their debts, to seek the supposed, “too-easy” protection of bankruptcy.

Credit industry public relations campaigns over the past decade have aimed at driving home a self serving moral message that is exploitive and completely unsympathetic to families with dying children, years of underemployment and joblessness. By making credit available to those in terrible financial distresses their message is clear, no need to face the horrors of bankruptcy, just refinance your way back to economic security. The rise in debt management plans and other borrow-to-repay schemes is solid evidence that the industry continues to exploit those already in financial trouble.

According to the Stanford University Law Review, when it comes to bankruptcy, it is unlikely that Americans feel less shame today than in the past. Perhaps modern Americans have read about public figures like Kim Basinger, the rock group TLC, former Texas Governor John Connally and most recently, Ruben Hinojosa, a Texas congressman that serves on the House Financial Services Committee who last week filed for bankruptcy. Apparently however, dozens of celebrity examples have not changed the perceived shame factor enough to help many who are most in need.

Too many financially troubled debtors unnecessarily decide not to seek the relief they are entitled to under the bankruptcy code. Many suffer depression and unwarranted distresses from the financial pressure that results. Far more often than realized, troubled debtor's reasons for not seeking bankruptcy protection are concealed and rarely articulated.

A recent assessment according, to Gallup, shows that Americans current attitudes are more downbeat overall than in February 2008. Moreover, that one in four that are unemployed are in financial distress. The stigma, embarrassment and concerns about the likelihood that a bankruptcy filing would become known to at least some family members, co-workers, friends and neighbors is affecting the health of many. Data from a recent university study shows that bankrupt debtors and their families are in more financial trouble than their counterparts of ten or twenty years ago. Worse, the data suggests that families may be more reluctant to consider bankruptcy than ever before.

The alternative is to learn what your real options are through a discrete legal evaluation. A decision that can empower your choice, clarify options, and reduce the stresses that are far too often unnecessary and undeserved.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Glenn Greenwald debates WikiLeaks with Frances Townsend on CNN

Glenn Greenwald objected to this premise:

"No, you're absolutely wrong because the New York Times used its sources all the time and take classified information that they are not authorized to disseminate...good investigative journalists, maybe CNN doesn't do this, but good investigative journalists work their sources all the time to convince them to give them classified information to inform the citizens of the United States about what the government is doing."

In a free country, the government cannot, should not and does not have unlimited power to determine what publishers can publish and what the public can read.

Tell us America, is there a First Amendment in our Nation? If the answer is yes then why hasn't our elected government heard about it? Our guess is self interest not public interest which is the American Dilemma. Too much secrecy does not serve the interests of the people of our Nation and is the cancer of democracy.

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Jullian Assange WikiLeaks Founder Assails Fox News, Huckabee and Palin


After listening to this interview of Jullian Assange, I encourage American's to review the Wednesday, December 8, 2010 posting below, "Bad Citizenship May Be A Crime."

Jullian Assange makes very strong points about the inappropriate, if not criminal conduct that has taken place by members of Fox News and some of our own elected government representatives. Their conduct needs to address and it is time for the American people to call them onto the carpet. We need to do our own thinking America and stop listening to irresponsible politicians and shock jocks who fancy themselves journalists.

Importantly, there is an issue related to the treatement of PFC Bradley Manning, cooking the facts and the absence of due process that has taken place on his behalf. Americans have reason to start demanding accountability from members of our own governmental.

The exclusive MSNBC December 22, 2010 of interview oJullian Assange can be seen at the URL that follows here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/22/julian-assange-msnbc-fox_n_800471.html

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Journalistic Transparency, a Mandate for Hope of Global Democracy



By RANDELL A. MONACO, Esq.
December 4, 2010

How much influence has Corporate America had on the recent efforts and mobilization of the international community and the U.S. Justice Department to censor WikiLeaks who has become an important international transparency organization?

Media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders on Saturday condemned the personal attacks on Assange and "the blocking, cyber-attacks and political pressure" in what it called the first "attempt at the international community level to censor a website dedicated to the principle of transparency."

The question being begged is to what extent have the recent intervention efforts been stepped up out of concern of exposed wrong doing and the promised WikiLeaks release of information come Monday about conduct on Wall Street and in the U.S. Banks? It seems more than coincidence that the intervention of US Senator Joseph Lieberman resulted in the decisions of Dynamic Network Services Inc., PayPal and Amazon Inc..

On December 2, 2010 American owned EveryDNS dropped WikiLeaks from its entries, citing DDoS attacks that "threatened the stability of its infrastructure". The validity of that concern should be questioned. The site's 'info' DNS lookup remained operational at alternative addresses for direct access respectively to the Wikileaks and Cablegate websites.

In step with Dynamic Network Services Inc., Amazon Inc. severed its ties with WikiLeaks, to which it was providing infrastructure services. As reported by Dylan Welch of theAge.com.au this followed the intervention of an aide on behalf of US Senator Joseph Lieberman.

Then, on December 4, 2010 PayPal, the payment processor owned by eBay, permanently cut access to WikiLeaks.org. In a blog posting PayPal claimed that WikiLeaks violated its "Acceptable Use Policy".

There seem plenty of reasons to question PayPal’s claims and Amazon’s denial of acting under political pressure following the intervention of Senator Lieberman’s aide. Senator Lieberman, who later praised Amazon's decision and called for other companies to follow suit, has also proposed new legislation to amend the Espionage Act to include the “publication” of “human intelligence” targeting similar cases — Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination Act, also known as the SHIELD Act .

Without discussion or public statement of review of obvious constitutional concerns related to the freedoms of speech and press, corporate America and the international community have acted to censor what should have been recognized as a public service to our Nation. The vulnerability and release of this information has exposed the real concern, NOT the publication which was after the fact.

Also, access to WikiLeaks has been blocked in the United States Library of Congress. Importantly, on December 3, 2010, the White House Office of Management and Budget dispatched a memo forbidding all unauthorized federal government employees and contractors from accessing classified documents publicly available on WikiLeaks and other websites. Presumably this would include off hours access from personal non-public computers.

Is seems that what is being focused on is the embarrassing wrong doing possibly by, and between, both Wall Street and government officials. This is speculation but this sequence of events is beginning to look and walk like a duck!
The temporary shutdown of WikiLeaks seems an end to an extraordinary week for Mr. Assange, a 39-year-old Australian, and possibly a warm up of things to come in the week ahead for Wall Street and others yet to be named.

A call to action for the boycott of Amazon, PayPal and eBay this Christmas Season would be a worthy stand for Global Democracy.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Sen Bernie Sanders Amazing Speech!

America needs and deserves a government that functions outside the conflicting interests that has destoyed our collective trust. A government that functions 100% of the time in their constitutionally mandated service, underline service of "people" they are elected to govern.

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Notebook: Wikileaks

Crime or intimidation and harassment?
Katie Couric discusses the website WikiLeaks that just released 250,000 State Dept. documents. What issues or problems would by the prosecution of Julian Assange for media. What lessons in history speak to the Justice Departments warrant for Julian Assange's arrest? These are issues that are far more important to the American public than diplomatic embarassment.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7100527n&tag=mncol;lst;1#ixzz16qjC0Lqg

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

'Should Corporations Decide Our Elections'-Part 4-Lawrence Lessig-- 10/15/10--NYC

'Should Corporations Decide Our Elections'-Part 4-Lawrence Lessig-- 10/15/10--NYC from Big Apple Coffee Party on Vimeo.

The information contained in this video is vital for everyone to who cares about our democracy.

Lawrence Lessig, Professor of Law at Harvard Law School and Director of the Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics, discusses 'Should Corporations Decide Our Elections' and how the 2010 Citizens United Supreme Court decision affects elections, lobbying, and the mixture of money and politics.

The event was sponsored by the Big Apple Coffee Party and their co-sponsors.

F.B.I. Seeks Wider Wiretap Law for Web



An interagency task force of Obama administration officials is progressing on a plan to develop new legislation to submit to Congress early next year that expands the 1994 Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act. Andrew Noyes, Facebook's public policy manager confirmed that F.B.I. Director Robert Mueller has visited Facebook and presumably other internet companies in Silicon Valley.

Law enforement officials want the 1994 law to also cover Internet companies because people increasingly communicate online. The law requires phone and broadband network access providers like Verizon and Comcast to make sure they can immediately comply when presented with a court wiretapping order.

Under the proposal, firms would have to design systems to intercept and unscramble encrypted messages. Services based overseas would have to route communication through a server on United States soil where they could be wiretapped.

The Commerce Department and State Department are questioning whether the proposed law would inhibit innovation. Among many other concerns, is whether repressive regimes might attempt to harness these same capabilities to identify political dissidents?

Comments from the Electronic Frontier Foundation and other advocacy groups are anticipated relating to what protections if any could balance or outweigh a justifiable concern for what seems a continuing infringment of fundamental constitutional freedoms.


Source article from New York Times, November 16, 2010 by Charlie Savage.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

Impeachment Investigation of Chief Justice John Roberts



Justice John Paul Steven's dissent in the Citizen's United case comments on the extraordinary way that the cases were brought before the Supreme Court and decided by Chief Justice Roberts when not properly before the court.

Justice Stevens said of the process, that it would be more accurate to state that, "we have asked ourselves to reconsider those cases." Democratic Congressman, Rep. Peter DeFazio is raising the prospect of impeaching the Supreme Court's chief justice over the issue on the basis that in the 2005 confirmation hearings, Roberts famously said, "Judges and justices are servants of the law, not the other way around. Judges are like umpires. Umpires don't make the rules, they apply them."

According to DeFazion, Roberts hasn't stood by his own doctrine. While nothing in Roberts' testimony is likely to be fairly characterized as perjury the reality is that the check and balance design of our constitution has been compromised by the political process highlighting the need for election reform, transparency and government accountability.

Amanda Terkel reporting for the Huffington Post article can be located:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/10/22/peter-defazio-impeachment-chief-justice-john-roberts_n_771431.html

Sunday, October 3, 2010

Saturday, September 25, 2010

Stephen Colbert Hearing "Protect America's Harvest"

In August, the comedian spent a day working at a corn and vegetable farm in New York state after Rodriguez appeared on his show to discuss UFW's "Take Our Jobs" campaign.
The effort is intended to debunk the theory that undocumented immigrants are taking jobs away from American citizens and highlight the fact the nation's food supply is dependent on these farm workers.

"Protecting America's Harvest" Stephen Colbert Congressional Hearing

Colbert says he is happy and honored to be there, to share his "vast experience" of working on a farm for one day, and hopes his fame will get this show bumped up to "C-SPAN ONE."
He offers to prove the value of vegetables by entering his colonoscopy into the Congressional record.
By the way, the comedy is way too fast for this liveblogger!
Colbert says he "rejects the idea" that Americans won't do farmwork because he is an American and he did it, in an effort to prove that he already had a way better job. He jokes that in November, a lot of Democrats are going to know what it's like to lose a good job. "I do mean this sincerely...please don't make me do this again."
"Apparently, the invisible hand doesn't pick beans." Adam Smith comedy.
"I'm not a fan of the government doing anything, but I have to wonder, why isn't the government doing anything? Like me, it's possible that they haven't read the bill." He then does the inversion thing, where he comes out in favor of the bill, along with a rather cutting, subtle admonishment that Congress doesn't always seem to act with much urgency.

Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Google’s Chief Defends His Privacy Comment — or Joke

The Colbert ReportMon - Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
Eric Schmidt
http://www.colbertnation.com/
Colbert Report Full Episodes2010 ElectionFox News
Eric E. Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, has faced some pretty tough critics in the past, defending the companies stance on privacy issues and new features on the Web site, but on Tuesday, he went right into the lion’s den when he was a guest on “The Colbert Report” on Comedy Central.
On the show, which is known for its dry and sometimes sarcastic humor, the host, Stephen Colbert, discussed some of the privacy issues associated with Google, including data mining and the secrets of its algorithm.
Mr. Colbert initially asked Mr. Schmidt about Google’s ability to remember information about people online and its storing of that information. Mr. Schmidt said, “It’s true that we see your searches, but we forget them after a while,” to which Mr. Colbert responds, “Uh, huh, and I’m supposed to trust you on that?”
After a few more jokes, Mr. Colbert asked why Google decided to pull out of China, referring to the company’s decision to stop operating in the country this year. Mr. Schmidt said the company decided to stop working in China because, “We didn’t like their laws.” (Mr. Schmidt said it took four years for Google to figure out it didn’t like China’s laws.)
Finally, Mr. Colbert asked about privacy (loosely paraphrasing a comment Mr. Schmidt made last month): “Now you famously said, and I completely support this, the idea that someday, young people, instead of having privacy for the things they put up on Facebook — and be able to expunge that since once it’s up there it exists forever — that one day that they’ll just erase their histories and change their names and they’ll be scot-free,” Mr. Colbert said.
Mr. Schmidt’s response: “It was a joke.”
Mr. Colbert said, “I guess it was too hip for the room.”
Mr. Schmidt recognized that it is best to leave the jokes to the comedians.

Chris Anderson: How web video powers global innovation

Monday, September 6, 2010

Derek Sivers Keep Your Goals to Yourself


After hitting on a brilliant new life plan, our first instinct is to tell someone, but Derek Sivers says it's better to keep goals secret. He presents research stretching as far back as the 1920s to show why people who talk about their ambitions may be less likely to achieve them.
Derek Sivers is best known as the founder of CD Baby. A professional musician since 1987, he started CD Baby by accident in 1998 when he was selling his own CD on his website, and friends asked if he could sell theirs, too. CD Baby was the largest seller of independent music on the web, with over $100M in sales for over 150,000 musician clients.
In 2008, Sivers sold CD Baby to focus on his new ventures to benefit musicians, including his new company, MuckWork, where teams of efficient assistants help musicians do their "uncreative dirty work."