Wednesday, February 23, 2011

Here’s Why Republicans Will Shut Down The Government




By Randell A. Monaco
February 23, 2011


In need of a strategy to rehabilitate their party from the economic disaster that has allowed Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, their associates in the Bush Administration government such as the Federal Reserve and others who let all this go on and enabled the disaster, Republicans needed to re-craft their image.

A purification strategy was needed to create the appearance of veering from the responsibility of Bush legacy which made that all possible. Conservatives also needed to reenergize their base and switch the public attention away from the real cause and people who are actually responsible. So, now it is teachers, police, firefighters, sanitation workers and their unions who have become the villains with their Rolls Royce healthcare benefits and pensions. The Big Government – Small Government debate continues with the assistance of a new diversionary tactic.

To overcome any suspicion that party leadership was not going to deliver on their promise to deliver major spending cuts to the public who supported them Republicans must now deal with the reality that they can’t enact their agenda because Democrats control the Senate and the White House. To save face, Republican leaders must dramatize their fight to carry out the promised agenda which leaves them no room to come out with a compromise.

Republican leaders have openly declared their hostility to compromise because they know that their support base, unlike moderates or even liberal Democrats, oppose compromise and as a matter of self interest and preservation the writing is on the wall, Republican’s will shut down the Government. Keep your eye on the political ball, here comes the shutdown; Tea anyone?

Thursday, February 3, 2011

WikiLeaks: The Inside Story Part II

Watch live streaming video from columbiajournalism at livestream.com

Watch Editors Bill Keller, of The New York Times, and The Guardian’s Alan Rusbridger discuss their interactions with WikiLeak’s Julian Assange and the decision to publish the secret diplomatic cables he uncovered. Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former assistant attorney general, joined this conversation moderated by Emily Bell, director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia Journalism School.

WikiLeaks: The Inside Story

Watch live streaming video from columbiajournalism at livestream.com

Watch Editors Bill Keller, of The New York Times, and The Guardian’s Alan Rusbridger discuss their interactions with WikiLeak’s Julian Assange and the decision to publish the secret diplomatic cables he uncovered. Jack Goldsmith, a Harvard Law School professor and former assistant attorney general, joined this conversation moderated by Emily Bell, director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia Journalism School.

Journalism School Dean Nicholas Lemann kicked off this highly anticipated event held at 7 p.m. on the Columbia University campus.

Sunday, January 30, 2011

WikiLeaks Founder Assange Tells 60 Minutes: "Our Values Are Those Of The U.S. Revolution



TechCrunch
Erick Schonfeld

In an interview with 60 Minutes, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange compares his values to those of the Founding Fathers of the United States and argues that he is actually playing “inside the rules.” He defends his actions by leaning heavily on the First Amendment, stating that “our founding values are those of the U.S. revolution.”

On the possibility of facing prosecution in the U.S. for leaking sensitive diplomatic cables and military documents, he argues: “There’s been no precedent that I’m aware of in the past 50 years of prosecuting a publisher for espionage. It is just not done. Those are the rules. You do not do it.”

Both the U.S. Justice Department and the Pentagon are conducting a criminal investigation against Assange and WikiLeaks, but if WikiLEaks is charged with a crime for publishing classified documents, it begs the question of whether other publishers such as the New York Times (which also published part of the documents) could also be prosecuted. Of course, the U.S. government is not currently going after the New York Times. It is going after WikiLeaks. But Assange makes the case that should not be tolerated:

If we’re talking about creating threats to small publishers to stop them publishing, the U.S. has lost its way. It has abrogated its founding traditions. It has thrown the First Amendment in the bin. Because publishers must be free to publish.


On whether WikiLeaks is anti-American:

Kroft: There’s a perception on the part of some people who believe that your agenda right now is anti-American.

Assange: Not at all. In fact, our founding values are those of the U.S. revolution. They are those of the people like Jefferson and Madison. And we have a number of Americans in our organization. If you’re a whistleblower and you have material that is important, we will accept it, we will defend you and we will publish it. You can’t turn away material simply because it comes from the United States.

On whether WikiLeaks is playing outside the rules:

Kroft: You’re shocked? Someone in the Australian government said that, “Look, if you play outside the rules you can’t expect to be protected by the rules.” And you played outside the rules. You’ve played outside the United States’ rules.

Assange: No. We’ve actually played inside the rules. We didn’t go out to get the material. We operated just like any U.S. publisher operates. We didn’t play outside the rules. We played inside the rules.

Kroft: There’s a special set of rules in the United States for disclosing classified information. There is longstanding…

Assange: There’s a special set of rules for soldiers. For members of the State Department, who are disclosing classified information. There’s not a special set of rules for publishers to disclose classified information. There is the First Amendment. It covers the case. And there’s been no precedent that I’m aware of in the past 50 years of prosecuting a publisher for espionage. It is just not done. Those are the rules. You do not do it.

On setting a dangerous precedent for future leaks:

Kroft: There are people that believe that it has everything to do with the next threat. That if they don’t come after you now that what they have done is essentially endorsed small, powerful organization with access to very powerful information releasing it outside their control. And if they let you get away it, then they are encouraging…

Assange: Then what? They will have to have freedom of the press?

Kroft: That it’s encouragement to you…

Assange: And? And?

Kroft: …or to some other organization?

Assange: And to every other publisher. Absolutely correct. It will be encouragement to every other publisher to publish fearlessly. That’s what it will encourage.

Kroft: To publish information much more dangerous than this information.

Assange: If we’re talking about creating threats to small publishers to stop them publishing, the U.S. has lost its way. It has abrogated its founding traditions. It has thrown the First Amendment in the bin. Because publishers must be free to publish.

On being an activist:

Kroft: It’s a dirty word. And people think that what you’re trying to do is to sabotage the workings of government.

Assange: No. We’re not that type of activists. We are free press activists. It’s not about saving the whales. It’s about giving people the information they need to support whaling or not support whaling. Why? That is the raw ingredients that is needed to make a just and civil society. And without that you’re just sailing in the dark.

Erick Schonfeld

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Watch Stiglitz: U.S. Economy Actually Needs More Spending



The U.S. needs smarter spending to climb out of the economic recession, says Nobel Prize-winning economist Joseph Stiglitz.

"The real problem is the way we're spending money not the amount we're spending," he told told CNBC in an interview at Davos. "What we really need to do is actually increase our spending on investments ... and cut back our spending on weapons that don't work against enemies that don't exist, wars that we're going to lose in any case" Stiglitz said."Let's focus on strengthening our economy."

Stiglitz's plan is to spend on investments that will stimulate growth -- a could begin to reduce the deficit.