Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Glenn Greenwald debates WikiLeaks with Frances Townsend on CNN

Glenn Greenwald objected to this premise:

"No, you're absolutely wrong because the New York Times used its sources all the time and take classified information that they are not authorized to disseminate...good investigative journalists, maybe CNN doesn't do this, but good investigative journalists work their sources all the time to convince them to give them classified information to inform the citizens of the United States about what the government is doing."

In a free country, the government cannot, should not and does not have unlimited power to determine what publishers can publish and what the public can read.

Tell us America, is there a First Amendment in our Nation? If the answer is yes then why hasn't our elected government heard about it? Our guess is self interest not public interest which is the American Dilemma. Too much secrecy does not serve the interests of the people of our Nation and is the cancer of democracy.

Sunday, December 26, 2010

Jon Stewart - Moment of Sincerity

Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear
Jon Stewart - Moment of Sincerity
http://www.comedycentral.com/
Rally to Restore Sainty and/or FearThe Daily ShowThe Colbert Report
Jon Stewart takes time to talk about why exactly he held the Rally to Retore Sanity

Jullian Assange WikiLeaks Founder Assails Fox News, Huckabee and Palin


After listening to this interview of Jullian Assange, I encourage American's to review the Wednesday, December 8, 2010 posting below, "Bad Citizenship May Be A Crime."

Jullian Assange makes very strong points about the inappropriate, if not criminal conduct that has taken place by members of Fox News and some of our own elected government representatives. Their conduct needs to address and it is time for the American people to call them onto the carpet. We need to do our own thinking America and stop listening to irresponsible politicians and shock jocks who fancy themselves journalists.

Importantly, there is an issue related to the treatement of PFC Bradley Manning, cooking the facts and the absence of due process that has taken place on his behalf. Americans have reason to start demanding accountability from members of our own governmental.

The exclusive MSNBC December 22, 2010 of interview oJullian Assange can be seen at the URL that follows here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/22/julian-assange-msnbc-fox_n_800471.html

Monday, December 20, 2010

Should America Shoot the Wiki Messenger?

The Queen of England tells President Obama why Shooting the Wiki Messenger is not America's Best Choice

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

BAD CITIZENSHIP MAY BE A CRIME


BAD CITIZENSHIP MAY BE A CRIME


By RANDELL A. MONACO, Esq.
December 8, 2010

Does restricting access to the Internet infringe upon freedoms of speech? Certainly not in the eyes of United States Senator Joe Lieberman, chair of the Homeland Security Committee, who has now taken credit for getting Amazon.com to kick Wikileaks off its servers. Amazon continues to deny that their decision had anything to do with Lieberman despite that he has warned other tech firms not to host the site either.

Joe Lieberman suggested on Fox News today that the four media outlets that have publicized the Wikileaks cables should be investigated. "To me, the New York Times has committed at least an act of bad citizenship," Lieberman said. "Whether they've committed a crime, I think that bears very intensive inquiry by the Justice Department.”

Has access to the internet become a basic human right? Certainly not in the United States where access seemingly belongs to PayPal, eBay and Amazon to plunder the nickels and pennies that still trickle down to the shrinking middle class. Does anyone think that Lieberman might now be indebted to these companies for their cooperation?

Does restricting access to the Internet infringe upon our fundamental constitutional rights to freedoms of speech and press? The legal analysis of this question requires a “strict scrutiny” test which simply stated requires a judicial determination of whether there is any other possible less restrictive way to avoid the harm threatened. Off the top of my head, it seems obvious that competent security of State Department Cables would be a much less restrictive manner presuming that diplomatic inconvenience is actually a threatened “harm” which outweighs the rights guaranteed Americans. This analysis seems to close the circle bringing us back to the issue of competence.

Apparently Joe Lieberman a former state attorney general, has little regard for our freedom of the press stating to Fox News that, “I think that bears a very intensive inquiry by the Justice Department” referring to whether the New York Times had committed a crime by publishing the diplomatic cables. How is the “publishing” by Wikileaks or the republishing by the New York Times different? The fact is that neither of them stole or conspired to steal the diplomatic cables that were downloaded by U.S. Army PFC Bradley Manning while serving abroad who then brought them home to Boston and, while on leave, sent them off to WikiLeaks.

Despite the absence of discussion, you might be interested to know that PFC Manning has not been formally charged, but is in custody. This raises the issue of why? If there is a genuine threat of “harm” and not mere diplomatic embarrassment or inconvenience then why hasn’t he been charged with treason? My guess is that the facts may still be cooking and that PFC Manning might be needed to testify should the Justice Department come up with a recipe to charge Julian Assange.

Julian Assange, I believe has, the same fundamental right that supposedly we each have which is to publish statements others make if they are true and accurate. He has a right to speak and the question that factually continues to elude discussion is, how does an Australian citizen publishing diplomatic cables from a foreign country commit an act of treason or some other crime? Without a discussion of jurisdiction, a “crime” of any sort requires the unity of a mental state and, as in this case, an act, presumably publishing.

I personally find these suggestions coming from a U.S. Senator UN-AMERICAN! After all these are the fundamental freedoms that our ancestors left their homes, fought and shed their blood to win for us. America, it appears Joe Lieberman and other senior government officials have deemed inconvenience, embarrassment and concealing truth more important.
Again, to my way of thinking, there is something seriously wrong when in this “digital age of enlightenment” one person like Joe Lieberman can cut our people off from global consciousness? The term for this, had Lieberman properly sought a Judicial Order to enlist the cooperation of PayPal, Amazon and eBay, is prior restraint. Knowingly, Joe Lieberman has violated the rights of every American with his admitted end run on our judicial processes by either, intimidating, bullying or bartering with PayPal, Amazon and eBay and intimidating other American tech companies not to host WikiLeaks.

In the end these unjust restrictive efforts and attempts to censor internet content, I expect, will strengthen the resolve of those who seek to and have a voice and disobey Joe Lieberman?
Last week, The New York Times and four other news organizations began carrying articles based on an archive of a quarter-million confidential State Department cables obtained by WikiLeaks making them available to their readers. Does America think that is a crime? I’m betting no!

In this holiday season, I urge American’s to show eBay, PayPal and Amazon that there is no place for their services here in the United States.

Saturday, December 4, 2010

Journalistic Transparency, a Mandate for Hope of Global Democracy



By RANDELL A. MONACO, Esq.
December 4, 2010

How much influence has Corporate America had on the recent efforts and mobilization of the international community and the U.S. Justice Department to censor WikiLeaks who has become an important international transparency organization?

Media freedom watchdog Reporters Without Borders on Saturday condemned the personal attacks on Assange and "the blocking, cyber-attacks and political pressure" in what it called the first "attempt at the international community level to censor a website dedicated to the principle of transparency."

The question being begged is to what extent have the recent intervention efforts been stepped up out of concern of exposed wrong doing and the promised WikiLeaks release of information come Monday about conduct on Wall Street and in the U.S. Banks? It seems more than coincidence that the intervention of US Senator Joseph Lieberman resulted in the decisions of Dynamic Network Services Inc., PayPal and Amazon Inc..

On December 2, 2010 American owned EveryDNS dropped WikiLeaks from its entries, citing DDoS attacks that "threatened the stability of its infrastructure". The validity of that concern should be questioned. The site's 'info' DNS lookup remained operational at alternative addresses for direct access respectively to the Wikileaks and Cablegate websites.

In step with Dynamic Network Services Inc., Amazon Inc. severed its ties with WikiLeaks, to which it was providing infrastructure services. As reported by Dylan Welch of theAge.com.au this followed the intervention of an aide on behalf of US Senator Joseph Lieberman.

Then, on December 4, 2010 PayPal, the payment processor owned by eBay, permanently cut access to WikiLeaks.org. In a blog posting PayPal claimed that WikiLeaks violated its "Acceptable Use Policy".

There seem plenty of reasons to question PayPal’s claims and Amazon’s denial of acting under political pressure following the intervention of Senator Lieberman’s aide. Senator Lieberman, who later praised Amazon's decision and called for other companies to follow suit, has also proposed new legislation to amend the Espionage Act to include the “publication” of “human intelligence” targeting similar cases — Securing Human Intelligence and Enforcing Lawful Dissemination Act, also known as the SHIELD Act .

Without discussion or public statement of review of obvious constitutional concerns related to the freedoms of speech and press, corporate America and the international community have acted to censor what should have been recognized as a public service to our Nation. The vulnerability and release of this information has exposed the real concern, NOT the publication which was after the fact.

Also, access to WikiLeaks has been blocked in the United States Library of Congress. Importantly, on December 3, 2010, the White House Office of Management and Budget dispatched a memo forbidding all unauthorized federal government employees and contractors from accessing classified documents publicly available on WikiLeaks and other websites. Presumably this would include off hours access from personal non-public computers.

Is seems that what is being focused on is the embarrassing wrong doing possibly by, and between, both Wall Street and government officials. This is speculation but this sequence of events is beginning to look and walk like a duck!
The temporary shutdown of WikiLeaks seems an end to an extraordinary week for Mr. Assange, a 39-year-old Australian, and possibly a warm up of things to come in the week ahead for Wall Street and others yet to be named.

A call to action for the boycott of Amazon, PayPal and eBay this Christmas Season would be a worthy stand for Global Democracy.

Friday, December 3, 2010

Sen Bernie Sanders Amazing Speech!

America needs and deserves a government that functions outside the conflicting interests that has destoyed our collective trust. A government that functions 100% of the time in their constitutionally mandated service, underline service of "people" they are elected to govern.

America Needs a Shared Vision First



By RANDELL A. MONACO, Esq.
November 27, 2010

In a recently published Rasmussen Report it was noted that 47 percent of American’s polled by telephone said our Nation’s “best days are in the past.” Thomas L. Friedman, New York Times Op-Ed Columnist and economist, in response authored Got to Get This Right which outlined his concerns to America. I first became aware of his article after noticing the length of a comment thread to his article on my Facebook. After reading the article, I returned to my Facebook page to give more than a glancing observation to the investment of this collective intelligence.

Let me say first, that I am fond of the intelligence of my particular group of friends on Facebook. As a group, I believe that America could again be a great nation if everyone’s friend-list shared a comparable collective intellect and engagement. Now with that said, what really jumped out at me next was that virtually everyone, including Thomas Friedman himself, failed to see, mention or discuss the single most important element required to change the course of what I agree is a disturbing trend.

To “get this moment right” we will need more than stimulus, hybrid politics, hard choices and a workable plan. We will need more than Medicare and Social Security entitlement cuts, investments in infrastructure, schools and government-financed research programs.
What America needs to get right now is a shared vision, a dream if you will, not a mere plan. The best possible plan, and I don’t think there is just one but potentially many, will be doomed to fail even before its inception without restoring the nation’s collective vision of who and what America is as a nation. In my opinion, a shared vision is the essential element to what becomes of our nation. The entire world depends upon America’s vision of itself as a nation.
I feel that Friedman’s assessment, that American’s want a plan to make America great again states the obvious. Our long-term concerns and intuitive awakening is an important step to a beginning for our nation, but sadly the idea of Hybrid politics to make these hard choices will never find the support needed because our collective trust in America’s elected government is gone, absent and non-existent.

The continued partisan politics, blame and increasing citizen engagement has become little more than a dog chasing it own tail. Without a shared vision, we are each guaranteed one thing in this moment we’ve “Got to Get This Right” which is, more of the same! We are each to blame on some level for how we got to this historical place whether it be, apathy, ignoring self dealing or failing to demand political accountability, take your pick. I don’t believe that all politicians are corrupt but the fact is that the system is broken and we are all in this boat together.
With that said, I commend President Obama for his efforts to steer America toward the future and away from public calls for accountability in Washington and on Wall Street when first elected. Then as now, America needs leadership and engaging in the blame game won’t deliver or contribute much if anything at all. The best thing the president could do right now is declare his support for election reform that has as a component publically funded campaign finance, transparency and accountability.

America needs and deserves a government that functions outside the conflicting interests that has destroyed our collective trust. A government that functions 100% of the time in their constitutionally mandated service, underline service of the “people” they are elected to govern.

We have recently seen congressional hearings at public expense giving audience to comedians like Stephan Colbert, Justice Department prosecution of Roger Clemens stemming from Senate hearings on inquiries about steroid use in Major League Baseball all the while ignoring the conduct of corporate America on Wall Street and their influence in Washington. Is that how we really expect our elected government to spend their day and our money? Do they really expect to find credible solutions entertaining comedians on issues like immigration on C-SPAN? Are we really that stupid or is it that our elected government believes that we are?

Shouldn’t our expectations be that the compensation received by our elected and appointed officials be earned in the “service” of America’s people? When did it become acceptable to campaign on our dime? Who spends $140 million dollars trying to get a job that pays $212,179.00 annually for four years? Why? Why are these want-to-be politicians like Carly Fiorina and Meg Whitman who for 28 years didn’t even vote, suddenly deciding on a career in public service? Shouldn’t we be offended by what we’ve seen?

Once Americans begin to understand that their collective engagement in partisan debate at this point is little more than civic masturbation, we can begin to examine how to change our government and restore the ideals of our nation which is the work of public service not self service.

Our long term concerns, if we “Got to Get This Right”, should be mindful of an important economical reality which is that 78 million baby boomers have begun to retire. The economics of this fact cannot be overstated from a health care, tax revenue and political support perspectives. And as a long term concern our educational investment in human capital, America’s greatest resource must ensure our competitiveness fifteen years into the future without the disruption of the four to eight year cycle that insures an unrealized benefit.

America does not need another plan – we as a nation need a shared “Vision” of what America stands for, is, should have been and should always be. Our shared vision needs to be seen in a vivid, detailed and credible image. Not as another partisan idea or promise. Partisanship at this juncture is the enemy insuring only our failure at the starting gate.

As a workable course for the country right now — one that needs to take place before any meaningful planned nation-building can take place, America needs election reform and a thorough house cleaning that restores our collective trust in elected government.

The best thing our president can do right now is declare his support for the draft recommendations of the Fair Elections Now Act developed through the efforts of Harvard University Professor Lawrence Lessig and the Fix Congress First organization. (www.fixcongressfirst.org ) My recommendation should not be considered a wholesale endorsement. It is genuinely my belief that congressional reform is the “Vision” America’s democracy needs to share at this threshold of any new plan for our nation.

Finally, I too believe that we would follow the president and our elected government - pay more taxes and give up more services – if, and only if, we believe that the plan is one that will truly make America great again.

[http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/28/opinion/28friedman.html]

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Notebook: Wikileaks

Crime or intimidation and harassment?
Katie Couric discusses the website WikiLeaks that just released 250,000 State Dept. documents. What issues or problems would by the prosecution of Julian Assange for media. What lessons in history speak to the Justice Departments warrant for Julian Assange's arrest? These are issues that are far more important to the American public than diplomatic embarassment.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7100527n&tag=mncol;lst;1#ixzz16qjC0Lqg